The results? Thats why the conversation is so important. That's absurd. As a male software engineer, Ive certainly been on teams that lack individuals with the strengths that women tend to have more of, but its hard to say what the proper ratio of empathetic individuals vs mechanically-minded individuals on an engineering team is. Scandinavians appear particularly interested in what I am saying. I didnt get the job. Women who have decided for a better work/life balance should realise that the payoff is just that; a better work/life balance, which is more valuable that the small financial price that is paid. If women do not try to negotiate for better pay aggressively, and are therefore not getting the pay they deserve then a gender pay gap exists. I disagree on his stance regarding gender equality, gender pay gap, toxic masculinity and femininity, the way he talks about the weakness of men, his views on victimhood, his views on rape, his opposition to Bill C . He discusses the pay gap, patriarchy and his new book " 12 Rules for Life ." Subscribe: http://bit.ly/2mFYm8e. With a vast online audience for his views, the sector needs to respond with hard facts and strong arguments, writes Adam McCulloch. Engineers, for example, tend to be those who are not only interested in things, but who are more interested in things than most people, men or women. So they actually help his case. Channel 4 News' full, fiery interview with clinical psychologist and professorJordan B Peterson, whose views on gender have amassed great controversy - and a huge online following. Jordan petersons books:12 rules for life: an antidote to chaos amzn.to 2yqv50ymaps of meaning: the architecture of belief amzn.to 3az6u0m. Newman presses him on why there are only seven women running FTSE 100 companies. The RAD Awards And thats why the information that I publicized in Scandinavia caused a scandal that continues to reverberate. According to ONS data from 2015, women still perform the bulk of unpaid domestic work, including childcare, laundry and housework. CONTROVERSIAL clinical psychologist Jordan Peterson claimed the gender pay gap is "unsolvable" and "deadly" in a 60 Minutes interview. Despite the results, myths and misconceptions about the gender pay gap persist. Staff writers Hmm, the deafening silence . countries. This article provided no such evidence (even some kind of evidence), just comments from people that get paid to assume the contrary conclusion to Peterson. Are you afraid your arguments wont hold up in a dialectical discussion? https://goo.gl/D7m2a6 Some employees at UBS face long-term cuts to their bonuses after maternity leave, while research by the Equality and Human Rights Commission found many British employers believe women take advantage of their pregnancy and have worrying attitudes towards unlawful behaviour when it comes to recruiting women. After working for decades as a clinical psychologist and a professor at Harvard and the University of Toronto, Peterson has become one of the world's most influential public intellectuals. Form follows function, function rules. HR practitioners should listen to his arguments and be prepared to defend their corner with the best evidence they can find to support the view that fairer recruitment policies make business sense and benefit us all. Article 106849 . It just seems sensible if our goal is to identify the best people. The biproduct of the IAT has been that it makes people resentful of not only having to take the test but of the whole concept, which is the opposite of the intention of the test. } Is Jordan Peterson's offence to the transactivist community a lesser one than that of leading feminist voices? Why cant any of these people present specific evidence that disproves Dr. Petersons claims? These arguments, in conjunction with the line about multi-variate analyses have shown the pay gap doesnt exist, are seemingly contradictory, at least on the surface. https://goo.gl/smtUHY Perhaps (and this is the explanation I favor) its because women have always taken primary care of infants, who are exceptionally vulnerable, and must therefore suffer from hyper-vigilance to threat. First, men and women are more similar than they are different. But it was a mistake of unforgivable magnitude and here are some of the reasons why: Given that only 26% of the elected MPs were women, the selection of half the cabinet from this pool means that it is a statistical certainty that the cabinet members chosen were not the most competent available. Jordan Peterson debate on the gender pay gap, campus protests and postmodernism Coming off the wave of that interview, Peterson was interviewed by VICE News, where he discussed sexual harassment in the workplace. I think he is describing health care. Gender pay gap remains largely unchanged, study finds. Those are ineradicable differences if you leave men and women to make their own choices you will not get equal outcomes.. I dont think its about disproving claims but more about presenting how many different factors there are in all this. Perhaps its a consequence of their sexual vulnerability. One of them is the difference in personality (agreeableness) and part of it is also prejudice. And these differences drive occupational choice, particularly at the extremes. Equality is a dishonest notion because those who use it do so to deliberately avoid distinguishing between equality of outcome (which is their real objective) and equality of opportunity, which is what normal, sensible reasonable people support. - Jack Blundell Gender pay gap reporting in Britain is making a difference. Western Culture is wasting a fortune to prove these PC ideas are as insane and unnecessary as they sound and meanwhile falling behind on the actual focus of the business at hand. engineering is all about empathy Seriously? We have no responsibility or desire to be an apologist for Jordan Peterson on any issue. If anything makes for a hostile workplace in business and universities it is the Mass acceptance of pornography. Email newsletters Hes being vilified along with Peterson and together they are being held up as the faces of the enemy. Diversity largely seems to be code for anyone but a white heterosexual male, and we can see in the article that its okay to be unfair in the pursuit of equality. This seems to be the most likely to generate the desired gender ratios, but at some point one would wonder whether there is some core function of engineering that is being neglected in pursuit of being diverse. I would expand on this by taking away anything that could identify age, sex, ethnicity, sexual orientation (why one would include some categories in a CV , who knows). That's the message Jordan Peterson tried to get across when speaking to "60 Minutes." Another myth says the gender pay gap is inevitable as women choose lower-paid jobs because of fixed biological traits. Men also choose to have children but the impact on their careers is virtually non-existent. By analogy, lets say that if you summed the average I.Q. Men and women wont sort themselves into the same categories if you leave them to do it of their own accord, he said. https://goo.gl/G3UXWJ At other times youll work on a project alone and then discuss what youve designed with colleagues. Instead, they insisted the pay gap is a result of discrimination. Everyone should read the full Damore memo before believing anyone on the subject. Its 20 to one female nurses to male and approximately the same male engineers to female engineers, he explains. Dr. Jordan Peterson 2019-02-24T18:52:40-05:00. When you ask thousands of people hundreds of questions (or ask them to rate themselves using descriptive adjectives such as kind, competitive, happy, anxious, creative, diligent, etc.) You failed to mention that the author quoted Peterson and sent it to these experts who had time to formulate a rebuttal without allowing Peterson to defend his position. The most extreme myth is that gender pay gap is a lie perpetuated by feminists who use statistics dishonestly to further their cause. With a vast online audience for his views, the sector needs to respond with hard facts and strong arguments, writes Adam McCulloch. . In the last lecture, in Helsinki, it was Finlands Fathers Day, so I talked about masculine virtue. Where is the high profile CIPD campaign to encourage more men into HR ? (function() { "If you're a social scientist worth your salt, you never do a univariate analysis. Virginia Republicans give Trump an edge, but only DeSantis and Youngkin lead Biden, The ESG attack on energy becomes personal, The Debrief: Conn Carroll on HHS encouraging illegal child labor, WATCH: Steven Spielberg likens rise in antisemitism to 'Germany in the '30s', AOC gloats after construction of Virginia Amazon headquarters delayed as company cuts jobs, Alex Murdaugh trial: Watch the key video that could've sealed guilty murder verdict. He describes implicit association testing (IAT), developed by psychologists in the US, as deeply flawed because, he claims, they cant reproduce results with the same individuals, so are unreliable. They want your perceptions to fall into accordance with their demands. The violent reaction to Peterson, and to Shapiro and others with conservative values establishes who defends civilization and who would tear it down. Those of you have invested years in all this PC nonsense need to start singing from a different song book. I would be alarmed if the HR community felt the need to close him down just because he is saying things they dont like. Women do choose to have children, and many will reduce their hours when they do. Peterson seems to assume that the status quo will remain the status quo. The most recent study, published in Science (by researchers at Berkeley, hardly a hotbed of conservatism and patriarchy) showed a relationship between a wealth/egalitarian composite measure and sex differences that was larger than that reported in 99% of published social science studies. >> CEOs will tune into the Canadians ideas and want to know why HR is wasting all this money. Jordan Peterson has HR in his crosshairs with his strident criticism of efforts to close the gender pay gap and to tackle unconscious bias. However, thats not exactly what he said and, as he never tires of telling us, hes, Now hes making both a statistical and conceptual point that might sound circular but its fundamental to understanding most social science claims. He. One of the creators, and there were only three, has completely abandoned the project, because it is being used for purposes it was not designed for. Two arguments that Jordan puts on the table to explain the gender pay gap are as follows: Women are more attracted to jobs that generally pay less than jobs that attract men (teachers vs engineers). World of Learning Summit opens its doors in London Olympia this February! Jan 20, 2018. The method? But Briner feels there is a danger the Canadians persuasive style and selective use of science could lead to a halo effect where people accept what he says without looking at the evidence. He fears his views could appeal to those who feel some resentment and who dont like to see other people gaining more power. So the gender pay gap is a myth. Jordan Peterson defends ancient truths with science and fact. He adds that the abilities and choices of men and women differed in part because of biology and this was why we dont see equal representation of women in tech and leadership. The rebellion against HR and the Progressive abuse of diversity targets documented here: http://amzn.to/2FQp6OM. The IAT can reasonably demonstrate some level of difficult to measure implicit bias. Im allowed to be a racist, sexist, misogynist, homophobe, etc. Peterson ascribes this gender imbalance to innate differences between men and women. They only respond in vague generalities. Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning, Three gender pay gap myths debunked video explainer. Overall, it's a level headed and fact-based opinion. 'Pseudoscience.'" This should be done by someone not performing appraisals. J. Andrew Dykens. For 50,000 years men and women have behaved in a way that enabled us to thrive, not just survive- cooperating, dividing tasks, and living in tribes. Where is the diversity in the public services. Why dont you accurately relay his ideas to your readers rather than making him out to be a monster. The wage gap perception is a manifestation of hard-wired male/female differences and society would suffer in the long run if we mind-control people into believing those differences dont exist. Jordan Peterson debate on the gender pay gap, campus protests and postmodernism - YouTube. The reason for the dual visits? . Personnel Today Jobs of African Americans is lower because of skin color. Sheila Wilds comment above (as others are ) is laughable. Mr. Peterson is a celebrity in the men's rights community, a loose collection of activists who feel men have been subjugated or betrayed by social progress. It doesnt really matter though because no one is keeping women out of any fields they want to be in. "That 9% pay gap, that's a gap between median hourly earnings between men and women. Seems there is an extreme reluctance to face some brute facts about the clear differences between men and women and their preferences when making work/life decisions. In another YouTube video, Peterson feels that gender pay surveys often produce a predetermined result:The co-variates you include in the equation determine the outcome of the equation. Referring to gender pay inquiries in the academic sphere in the US, he says that the goal is to conclude that systemic discrimination is at work, and they gerrymander statistics until they find a regressive equation that supports their initial claim. Like the Universities, HR is a corrupt institution, which is actively working for the destruction of Western Civilization. ); Your involuntary unconscious perceptions have to be retrained., Again, he is careful to ground his scathing criticism in some kind of evidence:People are categorised by novelty aversion. Personnel Today Awards 2022: Paddy Power hits the Whats driving diversity at McLaren Racing? They get worse not better. Why advertise with us? Again, there is an element of truth here. It is very much *not* about people. That's what I thought about when I watched a bogus segment on the Australian version of "60 Minutes" about the gender pay gap over the weekend. Two reasons. Basically if you change the name on the application form you change the outcome.. So, this is the Scandinavian conundrumone that also affects broader Western society (and the remainder of the world, soon enough). To take up Petersons example, its true that engineering is dominated by men. window.mc4wp = window.mc4wp || { Many of the contributors here did not say Peterson was completely wrong. But then there are comments such as this: CEOs should wake up and understand that HR is becoming an anti-capitalist fifth column in the middle of their organisations.. However, for Briner, Peterson does score some hits in his criticism of equality and diversity in organisations: HR must ask itself whether it is confusing the business case with a moral case. It is not just obvious in every single living species on earth but specifically supported as it relates to humans. The possibility of identifying a competent person increases as the pool of available candidates increases. event : evt, Given that differences in temperament and interest help determine occupational choice, and that difference in occupational choice drives variability in such things as income, it follows that political doctrines that promote equality of opportunity also drive inequality of outcome. PART 1: SCANDINAVIA. #1. The answer: the more egalitarian and wealthier the country, the larger the differences between men and women in temperament and in interest. And the relationship is not small. He says:The HR equity people are mucking about with peoples unconscious bias. } That statistic is from the Workplace Gender Equality Agency (WGEA), who are tasked with promoting and improving gender equality in Australian workplaces. One of the first things I (and, I'm sure, he) noticed after about a month is that John is always at his desk, but I am not. But. Thousands of companies have filed their gender pay gap figures, revealing men are paid, on average, more than women in the majority of British businesses. To close their pay gaps, companies should ensure women are on shortlists for senior roles, be transparent about pay and promotions, and encourage men to take shared parental leave, according to government guidance. Saw half my companys HR staff sacked after a consultancy reviewed their policies and procedures. I am quite happy with this the pay-off was worth it it is not all about the money! There are going to be more male criminals, and more male engineers, and more females with diagnoses of depression and anxiety, and more female nurses. Satya said: If anything, to me it is a very good example of why arguments about the UK wage gap will not be solved with "feelings," which is her argument. It's the question keeping women and diversity advocates up at night, and one outspoken academic supposedly has the answer - we can't. Jordan B Peterson, clinical psychologist and author of self-help book 12 Rules for Life, believes there are too many differences between male and female brains for women to ever achieve equal standing across every . 2023s top HCM trend: Predicting the skills needed for tomorrow, The Workplace Today Guide: Why it pays to support your staffs financial health. Alex Stein took to the street to try and solve the most important problem of our time: the OnlyFans gender pay gap. What about men who want a better work/life balance, of whom there are millions? Peterson mentioned women choose lower paying careers, but gaps still exists within most industries, including 66% lower earnings for female financial specialists, and 71% smaller incomes for female doctors (when age, education, race and hours were controlled). OHW+ We all understand fairness, or think we do, but very few of us understand equality. . Doug, separating fact from opinion is sometimes quite hard, particularly when both parties to a debate are using research findings, sometimes the same research findings! Jordan Peterson debates the gender pay gap with BBC Channel 4 News' Cathy Newman. You can eradicate them with tremendous social pressure and tyranny. They decide to take time out to have and raise children perhaps moving to more flexible work or less demanding jobs.. Gender gap in health service utilisation and outcomes of depression: A cross-country longitudinal . "Men are especially likely to place a greater emphasis on their role as financial providers," notes Kim Parker at the Pew Research Center. The result being that differences are exacerbated. According to Peterson, the population of agreeable people is dominated by women resulting in a fraction of the "gender" pay gap. This is a view shared by a small but vocal coalition of rightwing think tanks, Jordan Peterson, and mens rights activists. And low female wages were not simply an expression of this worldview, they also helped to create it, Griffin wrote. Not my business: how workplace racism goes unchallenged. I picked up on that as well. Perhaps the most worrying thought is not that Damores views may be wrong but that in writing them he committed an offense worthy of dismissal. cooperation and collaboration are of course essential, but not so much once a jab has been parceled out to the various individual contributors. About Press Copyright Contact us Creators Advertise Developers Terms Privacy Policy & Safety How YouTube works Test new features NFL Sunday Ticket Press Copyright . He amplifies Bhayanis point that testing without action is pointless, adding that fairness has become an important goal: Fairness means a lot. Nice, the two wrongs DO make a right argument. Glad to know youre using such a ethically sound source. The gender pay gap does not exist because men and women are paid less for the same jobs, it exists because men and women tend to do slightly different jobs. Its not the average more aggressive/less agreeable male thats in prison. All those other silly kids thought two wrongs was sill two wrongs. -> Peterson has a myopic view of research and uses it selectively for his purposes.. Hi Sean. That's the standard tactic of the left, especially when it comes to gender issues. Damore is indeed a scapegoat. A couple of them, which well discuss, may well seem to be contradictory while others, have some degree of speculation and opinion that are ferociously debated within the confines of academia. The median gap is a blunt tool, but a powerful one. When jordan peterson debated matt dillahunty, what unfolded was a fascinating discussion about morality. This approach is so far from the people being marched to re-education by their employer after they have been diagnosed as racist, as Peterson described recently.. Its no wonder that when I came bearing this news the Swedish Foreign Minister (a proud member of the worlds only self-proclaimed feminist government) suggested publicly that I crawl back under my rock, and that one of Swedens leading female politicians objected on primetime TV that her daughter could be raised to be anything she wants to be. If you want to see this in real time check out the comments to nearly everything the progressives of the worlds darling, @Justin Trudeau tweets, even on the very few occasions when he doesnt reference some variation on gender/identity/grievance politics. Another myth says the gender pay gap is inevitable as women choose lower-paid jobs because of fixed biological traits. This is a big problem particularly if the goal of such egalitarian policies was to minimize the differences between men and women. Google, like other tech firms, is acutely aware of the lack of women and people from ethnic minority backgrounds among its teams. Its proving very difficult. The job of the Federal government is important, necessary and difficult. Even if the IAT and the resume studies are valid, Im allowed to have my own thoughts. Over the last few weeks, I have been in Oslo, twice; Helsinki, twice; Stockholm, twice; and Copenhagen, once. If you minimize the cultural differences (as you do with egalitarian social policies) then you allow the biological differences to manifest themselves fully. Jordan Peterson debate on gender pay gap, etc Jordan Peterson is a psychology professor who has strong opinions on what is going on in the current Western society. . Peterson did not say that "the market is 80% controlled by women." Cookies policy Though the two have never sparred in person, they havent be shy about offering an opinion on each others work. (NewsNation) Working women made 82 cents for every dollar earned by men in 2022, according to research from the Pew Research Center, a rate that's . Women are generally more agreeable than men and therefore do not negotiate as aggressively, leading to lower paying wages for similar jobs. Just like any other productive venture its about competence first and foremost. Now it may seem small but the main thrust of Jordans argument is that part of what can explain the pay gap is that women are just high enough on agreeableness so that makes them less likely to negotiate agressively for higher pay. who was subsequently fired for expressing that view.). Those differences are a good thing. . He says:The best solutions recognise that it is not a one-off fix but a constant battle against our unconscious brains ongoing tendencies to stereotype. Adam McCulloch is a freelance writer and production editor who has worked in sectors including travel (The Guardian), aviation (Flight International), agriculture (Farmers' Weekly), music (Jazzwise), theatre (The Stage) and social work (Community Care). As with all averages, it smooths out nuances and doesnt account for differences in specific job roles, age, or previous experience. Content feeds And I think thats partly, because of the foreshortened time-frame that women have to contend with. However that doesnt mean that the pay gap exists, The Role of Agreeableness in the Gender Pay Gap, As a personality psychologist, Jordan Peterson is up on the literature surrounding The Big Five personality traits and his instantaneous command of the statistical distribution of agreeableness is, at the very least, very impressive. Only 26% of the elected MPs in Trudeaus government were women. Something approaching a consensus among psychologists expert in measurement, known as psychometricians (or, less technically, as personality psychologists). As an example he uses his work with law firms in Canada where many of the best performers are women yet the firms are unable to make many of them partners because they so often leave in pursuit of a better work-life balance. We arranged relatively smaller venues for the lectures in those Scandinavian towns, and they sold out immediately. If they are forced to adopt traditionally male thoughts like aggressiveness, working at the expense of family, they are more likely to work their way up the political/business ladder. Like many civil rights movements, it's had its beneficial effects. Good thing we have people like her in the world to set the record straight. These are not small-scale studies (heres another, equally recent). Petersons main argument is simple: Science itself is immoral. a bogus segment on the Australian version of ", National Bureau of Economic Research published a study, notes Kim Parker at the Pew Research Center, who in January took on Cathy Newman of U.K.'s Channel 4 in a debate about the pay gap. Author here. It reported that "women still make only $0.79 for every. Peterson argues that given the lack of science, they are skewing the argument, and I largely agree thats correct. The whole unconscious bias agenda, he says, is part of the broader corruption of social psychology. They are radically over-represented among those who view my YouTube lectures. window.mc4wp.listeners.push( And why should we presume that we know how in any manner to eliminate gender identity among young children? So this interview seems to have exploded in popularity in the last couple of days,even spawning memes about the way Cathy Newman handled the conversation, so i decided to post here to see what you guys think about it. We all want hiring processes that reward competent people. I don't think I've ever left my office later than 4:30 p.m. That's because my work schedule is entirely based on my teenage kids' schedules and on the countless errands I have to do on any given day that are related to, well, life. How can we bridge the gender pay gap? About Press Copyright Contact us Creators Advertise Developers Terms Privacy Policy & Safety How YouTube works Test new features NFL Sunday Ticket Press Copyright . The beauty of the study is that many of the orchestras in the study either did not always utilize blind auditions in the past or were just transitioning to blind auditions. Now hes making both a statistical and conceptual point that might sound circular but its fundamental to understanding most social science claims. Peterson represents the first true apolitical yet formidable opponent to a media that is showing itself every day to be hopelessly out of touch with reality. Over the last five decades or so, psychologists have aggregated great numbers of personality trait features, using adjectives, phrases and sentences, throwing virtually every descriptor contained in human language into the mix, in a remarkably atheoretical manner. Another approach would be to change the nature of the job to make it more friendly to women. The researchers found that the number of people just showing up to the audition skyrocketed when switching to blind auditions. Men and women are not the same and wont be the same, but that doesnt mean women shouldnt be treated fairly., There are other reasons why equality is unattainable, Peterson explains: Many women around the age of between 28 and 32, have a career-family crisis that they have to deal with. Jordan Peterson Refuses Justin Trudeau S Covid Booster Plea You D Have To Kill Me First The "jordan peterson's latest move involving justin trudeau surprised everyone! The Personnel Today Awards Jordan Peterson's view on the gender pay gap is that it's real and it's the consequence of many different variables. In. All of these traits in your [Damores] manifesto described as female are the core traits that make someone successful at engineering., The concensus view among specialists in the diversity field seems to be that Peterson is only explaining certain facets of the here and now. I have seen social scientists struggle to offer a cultural explanation, but I havent heard any such hypothesis that is the least bit credible, and have been unable to formulate one myself.