There is no page limit for the Je-S attachment, but a maximum of three letters is permitted and letters should be on headed paper, and be signed and dated within six months of the proposal submission date. This funding opportunity is only open to early career researchers who meet the eligibility requirements of EPSRC's New Investigator Award scheme. The duration of the project should be appropriate to deliver these typically 1 to 3 years. There is no page limit, but the statement should be on headed paper, and be signed and dated within six months of the proposal submission date. The reviewer form asks reviewers to comment on the national importance of the research. (15) The Development of Solvent-Free Reductions via . Please select the Lead Agency agreement under which you wish to apply. * SFI (Ireland) FNR . how competitive the proposed work is and how it compares to related international activity, whether the applicants show how their research fits with activities elsewhere in the world and whether they demonstrate awareness of the context and landscape within which they operate, to what extent the research will provide the UK with a unique capability, whether the applicant has presented the academic, industrial, policy, societal or other relevant context clearly. If you have a concern that the application raises ethical issues that have not been clearly identified or addressed, you should raise this directly with EPSRC, which will need to make a policy decision on how the application should be treated. A significant grant is usually defined as including more than 6 months of postdoctoral research associate (PDRA) time, capital equipment in excess of 20,000, or in excess of 100,000 full economic costing on 1 individual grant. You should use the cover letter to describe how your experience and career history fit with the person eligibility guidance. Work in collaboration with . These notes are intended to provide reviewers with specific guidance for the completion of the reviewer form. The reviewer form asks reviewers to summarise their view of the application. Researchers at UCL and University of Ghana have successfully predicted whether children have anaemia using only a set of smartphone images. New Investigator Award: Starts: 01 November 2022: Ends: 30 April 2025: Value (): 391,062: EPSRC Research Topic Classifications: Energy Storage: Sustainable Energy Networks . Your application is assessed first and foremost on quality (primary), followed by national importance (secondary major). The clarity of presentation may help or hinder your ability to review an application, so a comment to this effect would be appropriate, but this should not become in any form a competition in stylish writing. A proposal that demonstrates excellence can be characterised by terms such as: novel, ambitious, timely, exciting, at the international forefront, adventurous, elegant, or transformative, but it need not demonstrate all of them. We process and handle personal information according to these regulations. It is also a helpful technique to raise issues or concerns with the application in the form of explicit questions for the applicants. Post base: Office-based/Non Office-based (see job hazard analysis) Job purpose. Office of Research Services Your host organisations statement of support is important. Those who are seeking to substantially exceed this should consider other funding mechanisms. Three quotations for any equipment costing more than 25,000 should accompany the proposal. UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) is committed in ensuring that effective international collaboration in research and innovation takes place with integrity and within strong ethical frameworks. A full justification for your assessment of the application should be provided. NIA1: Acceptance to the Scheme. Let us know if you have feedback or would like to help us test new developments. However, they are not subject to the same eligibility restrictions as new . The content of a paper is more important than publication metrics or the identity of the journal in which it was published, especially for early-stage investigators. Epsrc New Investigator Award Cover Letter: Order . The panel will then use the information provided in the applications and the responses to the questions raised by the introducers to rank the proposals, using the assessment criteria, at a prioritisation panel meeting. Epsrc.ac.uk. The new target requires the UK to bring all greenhouse gas emissions to net-zero by 2050. Particularly with the increased pressures of COVID-19, EPSRC would like to stress to assessors that any cash or in kind support from the university for a grant is regarded as a benefit to building partnerships but is not expected to equate to cash or its equivalent (for example, provision of studentships, secondments, training and access to equipment). If applications to the open funding route and international development funding route are assessed at the same panel they will be ranked on separate rank order lists. EPSRC NERC OTHER FUNDERS Wellcome Trust UKRI . All relevant parts of the ethical information section must be completed. A project partner letter of support, from each project partner listed, must be included as an attachment. Personal award. The application you are asked to review includes a case for support. Specific guidance is available for each section of the report to be completed. You can also request support for research activity related costs, including consumables, for UK researchers during any time spent overseas. New Investigator Award: Starts: 01 February 2020: Ends: 31 January 2022: Value (): 246,055: EPSRC Research Topic Classifications: Mathematical Analysis: EPSRC Industrial Sector Classifications: No relevance to Underpinning Sectors: Related Grants: . We will not accept uninvited resubmissions of projects that have been submitted to UKRI or any other funder. whether the proposal contains a clear vision, addresses a specific challenge or makes a step change in its field, the progress this programme will deliver beyond current state of the art, the intended outputs of the programme, for example, new ideas, tools, techniques, discoveries, and whether these are ambitious but realistic. Projects should be self-contained and comprise a single research vision with clearly defined objectives and outcomes. This makes it easier for the panel to assess how complete and convincing the applicants responses are. HONORS AND AWARDS . The prompts are given as a reminder of those issues that are likely to be most significant in determining the overall merit of an application. Fast and efficient. New Investigator Award. You should indicate those aspects that you accorded higher or lower priority and why. Last updated on 2023/02/23 Sample Submission: 13 December 2023 Outline Deadline: 29 March 2023 Full Proposal Deadline: 13 June 2023 . EPSRC is committed to support the recommendations and principles set out by the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. Ethical considerations should not therefore normally be an assessment criterion and you should not take these into account when making your assessment. This is the integrated website of the seven research councils, Research England and Innovate UK. A full justification for your assessment of the application should be included in each section. support for full economic costs greater than 100,000. is based at a UK research organisation eligible for EPSRC funding. It is important that EPSRC funds are used ethically and responsibly. Customer Reviews. The changes also mean that some researchers who may have previously been ineligible to . For example: applicant is on maternity leave until a certain . Your comments, scores and confidence level should explicitly reflect your views on those aspects you can assess, and you are asked not to moderate these in any way to reflect those areas you feel you cannot comment on. The New Investigator Award scheme will. Prompts are provided as a reminder of those issues that are likely to be most significant in determining the overall merit of an application. whether the research programme and associated impact activities have been co-designed with external stakeholders or users: Does the proposal include objectives for impact related activities and are they appropriate to the research? Early career researcher collaborations for global development. As per standard EPSRC visiting researcher guidelines, funding is limited to 12 months per individual international partner. Download the New Investigator peer review form. Find out about the international development funding route. Normally you might expect to see a plausible hypothesis with some basis within the published literature, and some clearly identified objectives that sensibly test that hypothesis. Creating a Full Proposal and Electronic Submission. Beyond the immediate use-case of CNNs for automation, there is an opportunity to leverage the internal representations learned by CNNs to perform large-scale data mining and support biological discovery. Creating a Draft Proposal (ESRC example) Costing & Pricing and the Justification for Resources. Different reviewers will have been asked to cover those aspects you cannot, and the panel will then have the job of integrating these different comments. These will be viewed against published applicant eligibility and project suitability guidance. Case for support. It is expected that most proposals will have the potential to deliver some form of non-academic impact. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Councils (EPSRC) portfolio managers are happy to discuss applications before submission, particularly those with a complex management structure involving large consortia, or those crossing research themes. This question requires an answer. 2021. Proposed collaborations for this open funding route may involve international research partners from any country, this can include researchers in 1 or more lower middle income, low income, or least developed countries on the Development Assistance Committee list, where the focus of the research is outside the official development assistance compliance criteria. This funding opportunity is also subject to our policy on repeatedly unsuccessful submissions. Principal Investigator. Applicants are encouraged to have early discussions with their institutions to identify what training and development opportunities are available to meet their aspirations over the duration of the proposal. Let us know if you have feedback or would like to help us test new developments. They should be read in conjunction with the reviewer principles.